Australia vs Australia — 1948 vs 1986
| 48-215 FX | Commodore VL Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 60 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 105 lb-ft | 242 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,171 cc | 2,962 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 7.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 80 mph | 142 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 15.1 sec |
| Weight | 2,251 lbs | 3,021 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,642 mm | 2,668 mm |
| Length | 4,420 mm | 4,716 mm |
| Units Produced | 120,402 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1948 Holden 48-215 FX brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo answers with more power, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Holden has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1948 Holden 48-215 FX with the 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo holds a clear advantage in raw power with 204 hp compared to 60 hp, a 144-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden 48-215 uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,171 cc, while the Holden Commodore relies on a Inline-6 SOHC 12V Turbocharged with 2,962 cc. The 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo claims a higher top speed at 142 mph compared to 80 mph. The Holden 48-215 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 770 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.