Plymouth Road Runner

vs

Ford Falcon

USA vs Australia — 1968 vs 1971

Plymouth Road Runner (1968)
Ford Falcon (1971)
Specifications
Road Runner 426 HemiFalcon GT-HO Phase III
Horsepower425 hp300 hp
Torque490 lb-ft360 lb-ft
Engine Size6,981 cc5,763 cc
0-60 mph5.3 sec6.4 sec
Top Speed150 mph142 mph
¼ Mile13.5 sec14.4 sec
Wheelbase2,946 mm2,819 mm
Length5,156 mm4,900 mm
Units Produced300
Value (Excellent)$250,000$1,400,000
Collectibility5/105/10
Rarity8/1010/10
The Verdict

On balance, the 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi for outright capability, or the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III for a more distinctive ownership experience.

Overview

The rivalry between USA and Australia automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi versus 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi holds a clear advantage in raw power with 425 hp compared to 300 hp, a 125-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Plymouth Road Runner uses a V8 OHV Hemi displacing 6,981 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,763 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi edges ahead at 5.3 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.