Sweden vs Sweden — 1960 vs 2010
| 96 Monte Carlo 850 | 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 57 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 56 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 841 cc | 2,792 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.5 sec | 5.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 92 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.8 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,852 lbs | 3,935 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,490 mm | 2,837 mm |
| Length | 4,010 mm | 5,008 mm |
| Original MSRP | $2,295 | $47,790 |
| Value (Excellent) | $60,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
The 2010 Saab 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1960 Saab 96 Monte Carlo 850 counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Saab stable, the 1960 Saab 96 Monte Carlo 850 and 2010 Saab 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Saab badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2010 Saab 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 57 hp, a 243-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Saab 96 uses a Inline-3 Two-Stroke displacing 841 cc, while the Saab 9-5 relies on a V6 DOHC 24V Turbocharged with 2,792 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Saab 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 14.5 seconds. The Saab 96 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 2083 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1960 Saab 96 Monte Carlo 850 commands a significant premium over the 2010 Saab 9-5 Aero Turbo6 XWD, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1960 Saab 96 Monte Carlo 850 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.