Japan vs Japan — 1985 vs 2003
| RX-7 FC3S Turbo II | RX-8 Type S | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 200 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 195 lb-ft | 159 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,308 cc | 1,308 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 6.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 146 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 14.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,888 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,430 mm | 2,700 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,435 mm |
| Units Produced | 272,027 | 192,094 |
| Original MSRP | — | $26,700 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 4/10 |
The 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, better value. The 1985 Mazda RX-7 FC3S Turbo II counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mazda RX-7 from 1985 to 2003 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mazda. The 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S holds a clear advantage in raw power with 232 hp compared to 200 hp, a 32-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-7 uses a Wankel Rotary 13B Twin-Scroll Turbocharged displacing 1,308 cc, while the Mazda RX-8 relies on a Rotary (Wankel) Twin-Rotor with 1,308 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S edges ahead at 6.0 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.