Dodge Coronet

vs

Ford Falcon

USA vs Australia — 1966 vs 1971

Dodge Coronet (1966)
Ford Falcon (1971)
Specifications
Coronet Super BeeFalcon GT-HO Phase III
Horsepower335 hp300 hp
Torque425 lb-ft360 lb-ft
Engine Size6,276 cc5,763 cc
0-60 mph6.6 sec6.4 sec
Top Speed120 mph142 mph
¼ Mile14.5 sec14.4 sec
Weight3,450 lbs
Wheelbase2,946 mm2,819 mm
Length5,105 mm4,900 mm
Units Produced27,846300
Original MSRP$3,027
Value (Excellent)$90,000$1,400,000
Collectibility7/105/10
Rarity5/1010/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1966 Dodge Coronet Super Bee excels in more power, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III stands out for quicker acceleration, higher top speed, greater rarity. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1966 Dodge Coronet Super Bee against the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Australia. The 1966 Dodge Coronet Super Bee holds a clear advantage in raw power with 335 hp compared to 300 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Dodge Coronet uses a V8 OHV (B big-block) displacing 6,276 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,763 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 6.6 seconds. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 300 units built, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III is considerably scarcer than the Dodge Coronet's 27,846 examples. On the collector market, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1966 Dodge Coronet Super Bee, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1966 Dodge Coronet Super Bee rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.