Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 2004
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution IX MR | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 286 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 150 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.1 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,490 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $80,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. That said, the 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mitsubishi heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME with the 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR delivering 286 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 Turbo DOHC 16V MIVEC with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 4.5 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.