Holden Commodore

vs

Ford Falcon

Australia vs Australia β€” 1986 vs 2002

Holden Commodore (1986)
Ford Falcon (2002)
Specifications
Commodore VL TurboFalcon BA GT
Horsepower204 hp394 hp
Torque242 lb-ft398 lb-ft
Engine Size2,962 cc5,408 cc
0-60 mph7.0 sec5.0 sec
Top Speed142 mph168 mph
ΒΌ Mile15.1 sec13.3 sec
Weight3,021 lbs3,902 lbs
Wheelbase2,668 mm2,830 mm
Length4,716 mm4,942 mm
Value (Excellent)$65,000$85,000
Collectibility8/108/10
Rarity7/107/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo excels in lighter weight, better value, while the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Among Full-Size Sedan enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo and 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT is one for the ages. These Modern classic machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT holds a clear advantage in raw power with 394 hp compared to 204 hp, a 190-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a Inline-6 SOHC 12V Turbocharged displacing 2,962 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 DOHC 32V with 5,408 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Holden Commodore carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 881 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.