Australia vs Australia — 1986 vs 2001
| Commodore VL Turbo | Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 457 hp |
| Torque | 242 lb-ft | 420 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,962 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0 sec | 4.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 142 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.1 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,021 lbs | 4,001 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,668 mm | 3,048 mm |
| Length | 4,716 mm | 5,055 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $65,000 | $100,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo offers lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 counters with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Holden stable, the 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo and 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Holden badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 457 hp compared to 204 hp, a 253-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a Inline-6 SOHC 12V Turbocharged displacing 2,962 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Holden Commodore carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 980 lbs lighter. Both cars have earned their place in automotive history and continue to captivate enthusiasts around the world.