Japan vs Japan — 1982 vs 1979
| Cordia Turbo | Celica Supra Mk1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 135 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 159 lb-ft | 136 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,795 cc | 2,563 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.9 sec | 10.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 118 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.8 sec | 17.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,425 lbs | 2,875 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,475 mm | 2,560 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,620 mm |
| Units Produced | 142,851 | 76,807 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 5/10 |
The 1982 Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1979 Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Toyota heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Among performance car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1982 Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo and 1979 Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 is one for the ages. These Malaise era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 1982 Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo holds a clear advantage in raw power with 135 hp compared to 110 hp, a 25-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo uses a Inline-4, SOHC Turbo displacing 1,795 cc, while the Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 relies on a Inline-6, SOHC with 2,563 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1982 Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo edges ahead at 8.9 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 450 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.