Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

Ferrari 500 Superfast

Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1964

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
Ferrari 500 Superfast (1964)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A)500 Superfast
Horsepower110 hp400 hp
Torque96 lb-ft347 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc4,962 cc
0-60 mph10.2 sec6.0 sec
Top Speed115 mph174 mph
¼ Mile17.5 sec14.0 sec
Weight2,072 lbs3,307 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,650 mm
Length4,140 mm4,700 mm
Units Produced1,51936
Original MSRP$16,800
Value (Excellent)$350,000$6,000,000
Collectibility9/1010/10
Rarity9/1010/10
The Verdict

The 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) counters with lighter weight, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Italy. The 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast holds a clear advantage in raw power with 400 hp compared to 110 hp, a 290-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the Ferrari 500 Superfast relies on a V12 SOHC 24V with 4,962 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast edges ahead at 6.0 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1235 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 36 units built, the 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast is considerably scarcer than the Mazda Cosmo Sport's 1,519 examples. On the collector market, the 1964 Ferrari 500 Superfast commands a significant premium over the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A), reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.