USA vs USA — 1979 vs 1982
| Mustang GT 5.0 | Camaro IROC-Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 245 hp |
| Torque | 300 lb-ft | 345 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,942 cc | 5,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8 sec | 6.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 145 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.0 sec | 14.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,100 lbs | 3,350 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,549 mm | 2,565 mm |
| Length | 4,571 mm | 4,927 mm |
| Original MSRP | $13,270 | $14,675 |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 3/10 |
The 1979 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. That said, the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Chevrolet heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 1979 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 and 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z stand as two of the most notable Pony Car cars from Malaise era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. The 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z holds a clear advantage in raw power with 245 hp compared to 225 hp, a 20-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,942 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV (L98 TPI small-block) with 5,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1979 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.2 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 250 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.