Land Rover Defender

vs

Toyota 4Runner

UK vs Japan — 1983 vs 1984

Land Rover Defender (1983)
Toyota 4Runner (1984)
Specifications
Defender 90 V84Runner TRD Pro
Horsepower134 hp270 hp
Torque185 lb-ft278 lb-ft
Engine Size3,528 cc3,956 cc
0-60 mph14.0 sec7.5 sec
Top Speed90 mph112 mph
¼ Mile19.5 sec15.8 sec
Weight3,814 lbs4,705 lbs
Wheelbase2,360 mm2,790 mm
Length3,886 mm4,830 mm
Original MSRP$25,000$53,435
Value (Excellent)$100,000$60,000
Collectibility8/105/10
Rarity5/105/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 excels in lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 1984 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 against the 1984 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — UK versus Japan. The 1984 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro holds a clear advantage in raw power with 270 hp compared to 134 hp, a 136-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Land Rover Defender uses a V8 OHV displacing 3,528 cc, while the Toyota 4Runner relies on a V6 DOHC with 3,956 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1984 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro edges ahead at 7.5 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. The Land Rover Defender carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 891 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.