UK vs UK — 1983 vs 2002
| Defender 90 V8 | Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 134 hp | 510 hp |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft | 461 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,528 cc | 5,000 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.0 sec | 5.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 90 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.5 sec | 14.1 sec |
| Weight | 3,814 lbs | 5,974 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,360 mm | 2,880 mm |
| Length | 3,886 mm | 4,972 mm |
| Original MSRP | $25,000 | $94,150 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 4/10 |
The 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Land Rover stable, the 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Land Rover badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 510 hp compared to 134 hp, a 376-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Land Rover Defender uses a V8 OHV displacing 3,528 cc, while the Land Rover Range Rover L322 relies on a V8 Supercharged with 5,000 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. The Land Rover Defender carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 2160 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1983 Land Rover Defender 90 V8 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.