Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1998
| Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | Lancer Evolution V (CP9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft | 275 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.3 sec | 13.4 sec |
| Weight | 2,778 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 6,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $90,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
The 1998 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V (CP9A) emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A with the 1998 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V (CP9A) reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A producing 280 hp and the 1998 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V (CP9A) delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1998 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V (CP9A) edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.