Holden Monaro GTS

vs

Holden Ute SS V

Australia vs Australia β€” 1968 vs 2001

Holden Monaro GTS (1968)
Holden Ute SS V (2001)
Specifications
Monaro GTS HK GTS 327Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8
Horsepower250 hp457 hp
Torque325 lb-ft420 lb-ft
Engine Size5,359 cc6,162 cc
0-60 mph7.0 sec4.8 sec
Top Speed130 mph155 mph
ΒΌ Mile15.0 sec13.0 sec
Weight3,197 lbs4,001 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm3,048 mm
Length4,604 mm5,055 mm
Value (Excellent)$300,000$100,000
Collectibility8/107/10
Rarity7/106/10
The Verdict

The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1968 Holden Monaro GTS HK GTS 327 counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

The 1968 Holden Monaro GTS HK GTS 327 and 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 share a manufacturer in Holden, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Holden brand. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 457 hp compared to 250 hp, a 207-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Monaro GTS uses a V8 Chevrolet 327 displacing 5,359 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Holden Monaro GTS carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 804 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1968 Holden Monaro GTS HK GTS 327 commands a significant premium over the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.