Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

BMW 3.0 CSi

Japan vs West Germany — 1967 vs 1971

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
BMW 3.0 CSi (1971)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A)3.0 CSi Fuel-Injected Coupe
Horsepower110 hp200 hp
Torque96 lb-ft192 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc2,985 cc
0-60 mph10.2 sec7.0 sec
Top Speed115 mph137 mph
¼ Mile17.5 sec15.0 sec
Weight2,072 lbs3,086 lbs
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,625 mm
Length4,140 mm4,660 mm
Units Produced1,5198,199
Original MSRP$10,500
Value (Excellent)$350,000$180,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity9/107/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) excels in lighter weight, greater rarity, stronger collectibility, while the 1971 BMW 3.0 CSi Fuel-Injected Coupe stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1971 BMW 3.0 CSi Fuel-Injected Coupe is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus West Germany. The 1971 BMW 3.0 CSi Fuel-Injected Coupe holds a clear advantage in raw power with 200 hp compared to 110 hp, a 90-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the BMW 3.0 CSi relies on a Inline-6 SOHC with 2,985 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 BMW 3.0 CSi Fuel-Injected Coupe edges ahead at 7.0 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1014 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,519 units built, the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) is considerably scarcer than the BMW 3.0 CSi's 8,199 examples.