USA vs USA — 1969 vs 2010
| Camaro Z/28 | Camaro ZL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 290 hp | 580 hp |
| Torque | 290 lb-ft | 556 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,949 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7 sec | 3.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 131 mph | 184 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 12.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,150 lbs | 4,120 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,852 mm |
| Length | 4,724 mm | 4,836 mm |
| Units Produced | 19,014 | — |
| Original MSRP | $3,056 | $55,305 |
| Value (Excellent) | $175,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The Chevrolet Camaro lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 with the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 reveals how Chevrolet refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 580 hp compared to 290 hp, a 290-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV (DZ 302, high-revving small-block) displacing 4,949 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV Supercharged (LSA) with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 6.7 seconds. The Chevrolet Camaro carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 970 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.