UK vs UK — 1963 vs 1963
| Herald 1200 Convertible | 2500 PI | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 39 hp | 132 hp |
| Torque | 55 lb-ft | 151 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,147 cc | 2,498 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 22.2 sec | 10.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 78 mph | 110 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 17.5 sec |
| Weight | 1,848 lbs | 2,811 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,311 mm | 2,654 mm |
| Length | 3,886 mm | 4,438 mm |
| Units Produced | 523,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | $1,699 | $4,200 |
| Value (Excellent) | $20,000 | $18,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 5/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1963 Triumph Herald 1200 Convertible brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 1963 Triumph 2500 PI answers with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Triumph has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1963 Triumph Herald 1200 Convertible with the 1963 Triumph 2500 PI highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1963 Triumph 2500 PI holds a clear advantage in raw power with 132 hp compared to 39 hp, a 93-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Triumph Herald uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,147 cc, while the Triumph 2500 relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 2,498 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1963 Triumph 2500 PI edges ahead at 10.1 seconds versus 22.2 seconds. The Triumph Herald carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 963 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.