Cadillac CTS-V

vs

Cadillac Cimarron

USA vs USA — 2016 vs 1982

Cadillac CTS-V (2016)
Cadillac Cimarron (1982)
Specifications
CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4Cimarron 2.0L
Horsepower640 hp88 hp
Torque630 lb-ft111 lb-ft
Engine Size6,162 cc1,998 cc
0-60 mph3.7 sec14.5 sec
Top Speed200 mph95 mph
¼ Mile11.8 sec20.2 sec
Weight4,112 lbs2,450 lbs
Wheelbase2,910 mm2,570 mm
Length4,966 mm4,476 mm
Units Produced—132,484
Original MSRP$86,995$12,131
Value (Excellent)$85,000$12,000
Collectibility8/103/10
Rarity6/105/10
The Verdict

On balance, the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1982 Cadillac Cimarron 2.0L counters with lighter weight, better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 for outright capability, or the 1982 Cadillac Cimarron 2.0L for a more distinctive ownership experience.

Overview

Cadillac has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 with the 1982 Cadillac Cimarron 2.0L highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 640 hp compared to 88 hp, a 552-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Cadillac CTS-V uses a V8 OHV Supercharged displacing 6,162 cc, while the Cadillac Cimarron relies on a Inline-4 OHV (Iron Duke) with 1,998 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 edges ahead at 3.7 seconds versus 14.5 seconds. The Cadillac Cimarron carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1662 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 commands a significant premium over the 1982 Cadillac Cimarron 2.0L, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2016 Cadillac CTS-V 3rd Gen 640hp LT4 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.