Dodge Challenger

vs

Ford Mustang

USA vs USA — 1970 vs 1964

Dodge Challenger (1970)
Ford Mustang (1964)
Specifications
Challenger R/TMustang Convertible 289 V8
Horsepower375 hp225 hp
Torque480 lb-ft300 lb-ft
Engine Size7,210 cc4,727 cc
0-60 mph5.8 sec7.5 sec
Top Speed130 mph120 mph
¼ Mile13.7 sec15.9 sec
Weight3,600 lbs
Wheelbase2,794 mm2,743 mm
Length4,902 mm4,613 mm
Units Produced83,032
Original MSRP$3,266
Value (Excellent)$200,000$75,000
Collectibility9/105/10
Rarity5/102/10
The Verdict

The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1964 Ford Mustang Convertible 289 V8 brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Ford heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T and 1964 Ford Mustang Convertible 289 V8 stand as two of the most notable Pony Car cars from Muscle era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. The 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T holds a clear advantage in raw power with 375 hp compared to 225 hp, a 150-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Dodge Challenger uses a V8 OHV (RB big-block) displacing 7,210 cc, while the Ford Mustang relies on a V8 OHV with 4,727 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 7.5 seconds. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.