Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 1978
| Commodore VE SS-V | Commodore VL Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 362 hp | 204 hp |
| Torque | 391 lb-ft | 251 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,967 cc | 2,960 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1 sec | 7.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 15.1 sec |
| Weight | 3,827 lbs | 2,866 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,915 mm | 2,668 mm |
| Length | 4,916 mm | 4,712 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $60,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 6/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V brings more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1978 Holden Commodore VL Turbo answers with lighter weight, stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Holden Commodore. The 2006 and 1978 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V holds a clear advantage in raw power with 362 hp compared to 204 hp, a 158-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 5,967 cc, while the Holden Commodore VL relies on a Inline-6 Turbo SOHC 12V with 2,960 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V edges ahead at 5.1 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Holden Commodore VL carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 961 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.