USA vs USA — 1962 vs 1960
| Lark Daytona Convertible | Valiant Signet 200 V8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 235 hp |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft | 280 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 4,474 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.5 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.0 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,049 lbs | 2,700 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,692 mm |
| Length | 4,775 mm | 4,699 mm |
| Units Produced | 3,602 | — |
| Original MSRP | $2,814 | $2,405 |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $35,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 1960 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200 V8 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, lighter weight. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible and 1960 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200 V8 stand as two of the most notable Compact cars from Muscle era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible producing 225 hp and the 1960 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200 V8 delivering 235 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1960 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200 V8 edges ahead at 8.5 seconds versus 9.5 seconds. The Plymouth Valiant carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 349 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.