UK vs UK — 1970 vs 2002
| Range Rover Classic V8 | Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 135 hp | 510 hp |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft | 461 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,528 cc | 5,000 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 13.9 sec | 5.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 100 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.0 sec | 14.1 sec |
| Weight | 4,033 lbs | 5,974 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm | 2,880 mm |
| Length | 4,470 mm | 4,972 mm |
| Units Produced | 317,615 | — |
| Original MSRP | $6,000 | $94,150 |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 4/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1970 Land Rover Range Rover Classic V8 brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 answers with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Land Rover Range Rover. The 1970 and 2002 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 510 hp compared to 135 hp, a 375-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Land Rover Range Rover uses a V8 OHV displacing 3,528 cc, while the Land Rover Range Rover L322 relies on a V8 Supercharged with 5,000 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Land Rover Range Rover L322 Supercharged V8 edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 13.9 seconds. The Land Rover Range Rover carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1941 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1970 Land Rover Range Rover Classic V8 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.