Mercury Comet Cyclone

vs

Mercury Marauder

USA vs USA — 1964 vs 2003

Mercury Comet Cyclone (1964)
Mercury Marauder (2003)
Specifications
Comet Cyclone CJ 428Marauder 4.6 DOHC
Horsepower335 hp302 hp
Torque440 lb-ft310 lb-ft
Engine Size7,014 cc4,601 cc
0-60 mph6.2 sec6.8 sec
Top Speed130 mph138 mph
¼ Mile14.1 sec15.1 sec
Weight3,502 lbs4,218 lbs
Wheelbase2,921 mm2,919 mm
Length5,131 mm5,428 mm
Units Produced11,052
Original MSRP$3,224$34,495
Value (Excellent)$85,000$30,000
Collectibility7/106/10
Rarity7/106/10
The Verdict

The 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, lighter weight. That said, the 2003 Mercury Marauder 4.6 DOHC brings higher top speed, better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mercury heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

Within the Mercury stable, the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 and 2003 Mercury Marauder 4.6 DOHC represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Mercury badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 335 hp compared to 302 hp, a 33-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mercury Comet Cyclone uses a V8 OHV displacing 7,014 cc, while the Mercury Marauder relies on a V8 DOHC 32-valve with 4,601 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 edges ahead at 6.2 seconds versus 6.8 seconds. The Mercury Comet Cyclone carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 716 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 commands a significant premium over the 2003 Mercury Marauder 4.6 DOHC, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.