USA vs USA — 1970 vs 1966
| 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack | Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 290 hp | 306 hp |
| Torque | 345 lb-ft | 329 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,572 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8 sec | 6.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 125 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.2 sec | 14.9 sec |
| Weight | 3,300 lbs | 2,850 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,724 mm | 4,613 mm |
| Units Produced | 2,724 | 1,001 |
| Original MSRP | $3,635 | $4,547 |
| Value (Excellent) | $350,000 | $450,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 9/10 |
The 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering higher top speed, lighter weight, greater rarity. The 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack counters with quicker acceleration, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Among Muscle Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack and 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack producing 290 hp and the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer delivering 306 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda AAR 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.6 seconds. The Ford Shelby GT350H carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 450 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.