USA vs USA — 1982 vs 2010
| Camaro IROC-Z | Camaro ZL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 245 hp | 580 hp |
| Torque | 345 lb-ft | 556 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,736 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2 sec | 3.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | 184 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 12.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,350 lbs | 4,120 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,565 mm | 2,852 mm |
| Length | 4,927 mm | 4,836 mm |
| Original MSRP | $14,675 | $55,305 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 5/10 |
The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z counters with lighter weight, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The Chevrolet Camaro lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z with the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 reveals how Chevrolet refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 580 hp compared to 245 hp, a 335-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV (L98 TPI small-block) displacing 5,736 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV Supercharged (LSA) with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 6.2 seconds. The Chevrolet Camaro carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 770 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 commands a significant premium over the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.