France vs USA — 1964 vs 1963
| 1000 Rallye 2 | Falcon Futura Sprint 289 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 103 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 83 lb-ft | 282 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,294 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 10.0 sec | 8.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 109 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.0 sec | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,742 lbs | 2,850 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,220 mm | 2,781 mm |
| Length | 3,750 mm | 4,699 mm |
| Units Produced | 25,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | — | $2,671 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $50,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 6/10 |
The 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1964 Simca 1000 Rallye 2 counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1964 Simca 1000 Rallye 2 against the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — France versus USA. The 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 200 hp compared to 103 hp, a 97-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Simca 1000 Rallye uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,294 cc, while the Ford Falcon Futura relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 edges ahead at 8.2 seconds versus 10.0 seconds. The Simca 1000 Rallye carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1108 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.