Australia vs USA — 2006 vs 2008
| Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 | Challenger SRT8 392 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 636 hp | 470 hp |
| Torque | 601 lb-ft | 470 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 6,162 cc | 6,424 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9 sec | 4.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 193 mph | 174 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 11.9 sec | 12.6 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,915 mm | 2,946 mm |
| Length | 4,936 mm | 5,022 mm |
| Units Produced | 300 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $250,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 2/10 |
On balance, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 counters with better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 for outright capability, or the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 for a more distinctive ownership experience.
The rivalry between Australia and USA automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 versus 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 636 hp compared to 470 hp, a 166-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 Supercharged OHV 16V displacing 6,162 cc, while the Dodge Challenger relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 6,424 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 4.3 seconds. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 commands a significant premium over the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.