Holden Torana

vs

Ford Falcon

Australia vs Australia — 1971 vs 1971

Holden Torana (1971)
Ford Falcon (1971)
Specifications
Torana SL/R 5000 A9XFalcon GT-HO Phase III
Horsepower290 hp300 hp
Torque320 lb-ft360 lb-ft
Engine Size5,044 cc5,763 cc
0-60 mph6.0 sec6.4 sec
Top Speed140 mph142 mph
¼ Mile14.0 sec14.4 sec
Wheelbase2,540 mm2,819 mm
Length4,439 mm4,900 mm
Units Produced401300
Value (Excellent)$1,200,000$1,400,000
Collectibility5/105/10
Rarity9/1010/10
The Verdict

It's a closely fought contest. The 1971 Holden Torana SL/R 5000 A9X brings quicker acceleration, better value to the table, and the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III answers with higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.

Overview

In the world of Muscle Car cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 1971 Holden Torana SL/R 5000 A9X versus the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III. Both hail from Muscle era and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1971 Holden Torana SL/R 5000 A9X producing 290 hp and the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III delivering 300 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Torana uses a V8 OHV displacing 5,044 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,763 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 Holden Torana SL/R 5000 A9X edges ahead at 6.0 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1971 Holden Torana SL/R 5000 A9X, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.