Ford Australia Falcon

vs

Mercury Comet

Australia vs USA — 1972 vs 1967

Ford Australia Falcon (1972)
Mercury Comet (1967)
Specifications
Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IVComet Cyclone GT
Horsepower300 hp320 hp
Torque380 lb-ft450 lb-ft
Engine Size5,752 cc6,391 cc
0-60 mph6.5 sec6.8 sec
Top Speed143 mph121 mph
¼ Mile14.5 sec15.1 sec
Weight3,483 lbs3,450 lbs
Wheelbase2,819 mm2,972 mm
Length4,858 mm5,206 mm
Units Produced03,419
Original MSRP$2,848
Value (Excellent)$1,200,000$75,000
Collectibility10/107/10
Rarity10/107/10
The Verdict

The 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. That said, the 1967 Mercury Comet Cyclone GT brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mercury heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

Putting the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV against the 1967 Mercury Comet Cyclone GT is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Australia versus USA. The 1967 Mercury Comet Cyclone GT holds a clear advantage in raw power with 320 hp compared to 300 hp, a 20-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 6.8 seconds. On the collector market, the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV commands a significant premium over the 1967 Mercury Comet Cyclone GT, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1972 Ford Australia Falcon XA GT-HO Phase IV rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.