Australia vs Australia — 1986 vs 2006
| Commodore VL Turbo | Commodore VE SS-V | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 362 hp |
| Torque | 242 lb-ft | 391 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,962 cc | 5,967 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0 sec | 5.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 142 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.1 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,021 lbs | 3,827 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,668 mm | 2,915 mm |
| Length | 4,716 mm | 4,916 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $65,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1986 Holden Commodore VL Turbo brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V answers with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Holden Commodore. The 1986 and 2006 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V holds a clear advantage in raw power with 362 hp compared to 204 hp, a 158-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a Inline-6 SOHC 12V Turbocharged displacing 2,962 cc, while the Holden Commodore relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,967 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V edges ahead at 5.1 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Holden Commodore carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 806 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.