Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 2001
| Commodore VE SS-V | Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 362 hp | 457 hp |
| Torque | 391 lb-ft | 420 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,967 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1 sec | 4.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,827 lbs | 4,001 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,915 mm | 3,048 mm |
| Length | 4,916 mm | 5,055 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $100,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V excels in better value, while the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 2006 Holden Commodore VE SS-V and 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 share a manufacturer in Holden, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Holden brand. The 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 457 hp compared to 362 hp, a 95-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 5,967 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 5.1 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.