USA vs Australia — 1969 vs 1971
| Mustang Boss 429 | Valiant Charger VH R/T E49 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 375 hp | 302 hp |
| Torque | 450 lb-ft | 305 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,030 cc | 4,343 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8 sec | 6.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 122 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.1 sec | 14.4 sec |
| Weight | 3,540 lbs | 3,010 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,667 mm |
| Length | 4,775 mm | 4,572 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,358 | 149 |
| Original MSRP | $4,798 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $600,000 | $750,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Numbers favor the 1971 Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger VH R/T E49 with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. The 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 429 offers more power, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
The rivalry between USA and Australia automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 429 versus 1971 Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger VH R/T E49 is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 429 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 375 hp compared to 302 hp, a 73-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV (semi-hemispherical combustion chambers) displacing 7,030 cc, while the Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger relies on a Inline-6 OHV Hemi (E49 265) with 4,343 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger VH R/T E49 edges ahead at 6.1 seconds versus 6.8 seconds. The Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 530 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 149 units built, the 1971 Chrysler Australia Valiant Charger VH R/T E49 is considerably scarcer than the Ford Mustang's 1,358 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.