USA vs Australia — 1960 vs 2002
| Falcon | Falcon BA GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 85 hp | 394 hp |
| Torque | 130 lb-ft | 398 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,365 cc | 5,408 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 17.0 sec | 5.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 87 mph | 168 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 21.0 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | 2,300 lbs | 3,902 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,768 mm | 2,830 mm |
| Length | 4,547 mm | 4,942 mm |
| Units Produced | 435,676 | — |
| Original MSRP | $1,912 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $18,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 2/10 | 7/10 |
The 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1960 Ford Falcon counters with lighter weight, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The Ford Falcon lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1960 Ford Falcon with the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT reveals how Ford refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT holds a clear advantage in raw power with 394 hp compared to 85 hp, a 309-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Falcon uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,365 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 DOHC 32V with 5,408 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 17.0 seconds. The Ford Falcon carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1602 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT commands a significant premium over the 1960 Ford Falcon, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.