France vs France — 1934 vs 1996
| Traction Avant 11CV Normale | Saxo VTS 16V | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 56 hp | 120 hp |
| Torque | 89 lb-ft | 107 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,911 cc | 1,587 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 7.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 73 mph | 126 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,249 lbs | 2,061 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,910 mm | 2,379 mm |
| Length | 4,450 mm | 3,718 mm |
| Units Produced | 759,123 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $50,000 | $15,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 6/10 |
The 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, higher top speed, lighter weight. The 1934 Citroen Traction Avant 11CV Normale counters with stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1934 Citroen Traction Avant 11CV Normale and 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V share a manufacturer in Citroen, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Citroen brand. The 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V holds a clear advantage in raw power with 120 hp compared to 56 hp, a 64-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Citroen Traction Avant uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,911 cc, while the Citroen Saxo relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V with 1,587 cc. The 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V claims a higher top speed at 126 mph compared to 73 mph. On the collector market, the 1934 Citroen Traction Avant 11CV Normale commands a significant premium over the 1996 Citroen Saxo VTS 16V, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1934 Citroen Traction Avant 11CV Normale rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.