USA vs Australia — 1970 vs 1968
| Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6 | Falcon GT-HO Phase III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 390 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 490 lb-ft | 360 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,206 cc | 5,763 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 145 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.7 sec | 14.4 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,819 mm |
| Length | 4,750 mm | 4,908 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 300 |
| Value (Excellent) | $200,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 10/10 |
The 1970 Plymouth Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, better value. That said, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III brings higher top speed and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Ford heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Putting the 1970 Plymouth Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6 against the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Australia. The 1970 Plymouth Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 390 hp compared to 300 hp, a 90-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6 edges ahead at 5.6 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1970 Plymouth Barracuda 'Cuda 440-6, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.