France vs France — 1992 vs 1989
| Clio Williams | 21 Turbo Quadra | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 175 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | 203 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,995 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 sec | 7.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | 15.2 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,888 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,656 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 4,497 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $55,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Numbers favor the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1992 Renault Clio Williams offers its unique character, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
Renault has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1992 Renault Clio Williams with the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra holds a clear advantage in raw power with 175 hp compared to 150 hp, a 25-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault 21 relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbo with 1,995 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra edges ahead at 7.0 seconds versus 7.2 seconds. On the collector market, the 1992 Renault Clio Williams commands a significant premium over the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.