Sweden vs Sweden — 1981 vs 1968
| 242 Turbo Group A Homologation | 164 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 155 hp | 160 hp |
| Torque | 181 lb-ft | 180 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,127 cc | 2,978 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.9 sec | 10.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 124 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.7 sec | 17.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,932 lbs | 3,097 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,640 mm | 2,700 mm |
| Length | 4,790 mm | 4,785 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 146,008 |
| Original MSRP | $16,495 | $5,200 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
On balance, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. However, the 1968 Volvo 164 E counters with better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation for outright capability, or the 1968 Volvo 164 E for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Volvo has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation with the 1968 Volvo 164 E highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation producing 155 hp and the 1968 Volvo 164 E delivering 160 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo 242 Turbo uses a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC displacing 2,127 cc, while the Volvo 164 relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 2,978 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation edges ahead at 8.9 seconds versus 10.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation commands a significant premium over the 1968 Volvo 164 E, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.