Australia vs Australia — 1968 vs 2002
| Falcon GT-HO Phase III | Falcon BA GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 394 hp |
| Torque | 360 lb-ft | 398 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,763 cc | 5,408 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4 sec | 5.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 145 mph | 168 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.4 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,902 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,830 mm |
| Length | 4,908 mm | 4,942 mm |
| Units Produced | 300 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $1,500,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 7/10 |
The 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Ford Falcon GT-HO from 1968 to 2002 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Ford. The 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT holds a clear advantage in raw power with 394 hp compared to 300 hp, a 94-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Falcon GT-HO uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 5,763 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 DOHC 32V with 5,408 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2002 Ford Falcon BA GT rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.