Australia vs Australia β 1967 vs 1998
| Falcon GT XR GT | Falcon FG GT-F 351 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 230 hp | 462 hp |
| Torque | 282 lb-ft | 457 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,942 cc | 5,000 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2 sec | 4.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 118 mph | 168 mph |
| ΒΌ Mile | 15.8 sec | 12.3 sec |
| Weight | 3,009 lbs | 3,968 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,830 mm |
| Length | 4,690 mm | 4,941 mm |
| Units Produced | 588 | 550 |
| Value (Excellent) | $250,000 | $150,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 8/10 |
The 1998 Ford Australia Falcon FG GT-F 351 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Ford Australia Falcon GT XR GT counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Ford Australia Falcon GT from 1967 to 1998 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Ford Australia. The 1998 Ford Australia Falcon FG GT-F 351 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 462 hp compared to 230 hp, a 232-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Australia Falcon GT uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,942 cc, while the Ford Australia Falcon FG relies on a V8 Supercharged DOHC 32V with 5,000 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1998 Ford Australia Falcon FG GT-F 351 edges ahead at 4.3 seconds versus 8.2 seconds. The Ford Australia Falcon GT carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 959 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.