USA vs USA — 2010 vs 1987
| Camaro ZL1 | Regal GNX | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 580 hp | 276 hp |
| Torque | 556 lb-ft | 360 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 6,162 cc | 3,791 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 184 mph | 124 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 12.0 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 4,120 lbs | 3,640 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 2,769 mm |
| Length | 4,836 mm | 5,023 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 547 |
| Original MSRP | $55,305 | $29,290 |
| Value (Excellent) | $55,000 | $275,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 10/10 |
The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1987 Buick Regal GNX brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Buick heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 and 1987 Buick Regal GNX stand as two of the most notable Muscle Car cars from Modern classic. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 580 hp compared to 276 hp, a 304-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV Supercharged (LSA) displacing 6,162 cc, while the Buick Regal relies on a V6 Turbo with 3,791 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. The Buick Regal carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 480 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1987 Buick Regal GNX commands a significant premium over the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1987 Buick Regal GNX rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.