AC Cobra

vs

Lamborghini Urraco

UK vs Italy β€” 1962 vs 1973

AC Cobra (1962)
Lamborghini Urraco (1973)
Specifications
Cobra 289Urraco P300
Horsepower271 hp265 hp
Torque310 lb-ft217 lb-ft
Engine Size4,736 cc2,996 cc
0-60 mph5.5 sec6.2 sec
Top Speed140 mph155 mph
ΒΌ Mile13.6 sec14.5 sec
Weight2,248 lbs2,646 lbs
Wheelbase2,286 mm2,450 mm
Length3,962 mm4,250 mm
Units Produced654776
Original MSRP$5,995$22,000
Value (Excellent)$2,000,000$250,000
Collectibility10/107/10
Rarity9/107/10
The Verdict

This matchup is remarkably close. The 1962 AC Cobra 289 offers quicker acceleration, lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 1973 Lamborghini Urraco P300 counters with higher top speed, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.

Overview

When UK engineering meets Italy craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1962 AC Cobra 289 and 1973 Lamborghini Urraco P300 embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1962 AC Cobra 289 producing 271 hp and the 1973 Lamborghini Urraco P300 delivering 265 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the AC Cobra uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Lamborghini Urraco relies on a V8 SOHC with 2,996 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 AC Cobra 289 edges ahead at 5.5 seconds versus 6.2 seconds. The AC Cobra carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 398 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1962 AC Cobra 289 commands a significant premium over the 1973 Lamborghini Urraco P300, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1962 AC Cobra 289 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.