UK vs UK — 1970 vs 2013
| Range Rover Classic | Range Rover SVAutobiography L405 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 135 hp | 565 hp |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft | 516 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,528 cc | 5,000 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.2 sec | 5.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.5 sec | 13.2 sec |
| Weight | — | 5,577 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm | 3,120 mm |
| Length | 4,470 mm | 5,200 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $210,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $170,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Numbers favor the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405 with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1970 Land Rover Range Rover Classic offers better value, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Land Rover Range Rover. The 1970 and 2013 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 565 hp compared to 135 hp, a 430-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Land Rover Range Rover uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 3,528 cc, while the Land Rover Range Rover relies on a V8 Supercharged with 5,000 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover SVAutobiography L405 edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 14.2 seconds. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.