France vs France — 1992 vs 1965
| Clio Williams | 16 TS | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 83 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | 94 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,565 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | 103 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | 19.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,293 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,650 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 4,260 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | 1,845,959 |
| Value (Excellent) | $55,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 6/10 |
The 1992 Renault Clio Williams holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1965 Renault 16 TS brings stronger collectibility, better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Renault heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Within the Renault stable, the 1992 Renault Clio Williams and 1965 Renault 16 TS represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Renault badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1992 Renault Clio Williams holds a clear advantage in raw power with 150 hp compared to 83 hp, a 67-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault 16 relies on a Inline-4 OHV with 1,565 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Renault Clio Williams edges ahead at 7.2 seconds versus 13.5 seconds. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 12,100 units built, the 1992 Renault Clio Williams is considerably scarcer than the Renault 16's 1,845,959 examples. On the collector market, the 1992 Renault Clio Williams commands a significant premium over the 1965 Renault 16 TS, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.