France vs France — 1962 vs 1966
| Caravelle 1100S Convertible | R16 TX | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 55 hp | 83 hp |
| Torque | 61 lb-ft | 94 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,108 cc | 1,565 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 17.0 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 90 mph | 103 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 20.5 sec | 19.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,830 lbs | 2,249 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,270 mm | 2,670 mm |
| Length | 4,280 mm | 4,250 mm |
| Units Produced | 117,000 | 1,846,000 |
| Original MSRP | $2,100 | $2,650 |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $30,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible excels in lighter weight, greater rarity, while the 1966 Renault R16 TX stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible and 1966 Renault R16 TX share a manufacturer in Renault, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Renault brand. The 1966 Renault R16 TX holds a clear advantage in raw power with 83 hp compared to 55 hp, a 28-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1966 Renault R16 TX edges ahead at 13.5 seconds versus 17.0 seconds. The Renault Caravelle carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 419 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 117,000 units built, the 1962 Renault Caravelle 1100S Convertible is considerably scarcer than the Renault R16's 1,846,000 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.