Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1962
| 2000GT MF10 | Rivolta IR 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 133 lb-ft | 340 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,988 cc | 5,359 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4 sec | 7.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 137 mph | 142 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.9 sec | 15.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,469 lbs | 2,998 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,330 mm | 2,650 mm |
| Length | 4,175 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Units Produced | 351 | 797 |
| Original MSRP | $6,800 | $8,700 |
| Value (Excellent) | $2,000,000 | $200,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 7/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1967 Toyota 2000GT MF10 brings lighter weight, greater rarity, stronger collectibility to the table, and the 1962 Iso Rivolta IR 300 answers with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
The rivalry between Japan and Italy automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1967 Toyota 2000GT MF10 versus 1962 Iso Rivolta IR 300 is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1962 Iso Rivolta IR 300 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 150 hp, a 150-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Toyota 2000GT uses a Inline-6 DOHC (3M) displacing 1,988 cc, while the Iso Rivolta relies on a V8 OHV with 5,359 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Iso Rivolta IR 300 edges ahead at 7.5 seconds versus 8.4 seconds. The Toyota 2000GT carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 529 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1967 Toyota 2000GT MF10 commands a significant premium over the 1962 Iso Rivolta IR 300, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1967 Toyota 2000GT MF10 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.