Australia vs USA — 1968 vs 1963
| Falcon GT-HO Phase III | Falcon Futura Sprint 289 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 360 lb-ft | 282 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,763 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4 sec | 8.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 145 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.4 sec | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,850 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,781 mm |
| Length | 4,908 mm | 4,699 mm |
| Units Produced | 300 | — |
| Original MSRP | — | $2,671 |
| Value (Excellent) | $1,500,000 | $50,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 6/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 counters with stronger collectibility, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Ford Falcon GT-HO lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III with the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289 reveals how Ford refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 200 hp, a 100-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Falcon GT-HO uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 5,763 cc, while the Ford Falcon Futura relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 8.2 seconds. On the collector market, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1963 Ford Falcon Futura Sprint 289, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.