Holden Commodore VE

vs

Holden Ute SS V

Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 2001

Holden Commodore VE (2006)
Holden Ute SS V (2001)
Specifications
Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8
Horsepower636 hp457 hp
Torque601 lb-ft420 lb-ft
Engine Size6,162 cc6,162 cc
0-60 mph3.9 sec4.8 sec
Top Speed193 mph155 mph
¼ Mile12.0 sec13.0 sec
Weight4,081 lbs4,001 lbs
Wheelbase2,915 mm3,048 mm
Length4,932 mm5,055 mm
Units Produced275
Value (Excellent)$500,000$100,000
Collectibility10/107/10
Rarity9/106/10
The Verdict

The 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Holden heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

The 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 and 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8 share a manufacturer in Holden, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Holden brand. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 636 hp compared to 457 hp, a 179-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore VE uses a V8 Supercharged OHV LS9 displacing 6,162 cc, while the Holden Ute SS V relies on a V8 OHV with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 4.8 seconds. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 commands a significant premium over the 2001 Holden Ute SS V HSV Maloo R8, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.