Dodge Charger

vs

Ford Falcon

USA vs Australia — 1966 vs 1971

Dodge Charger (1966)
Ford Falcon (1971)
Specifications
Charger DaytonaFalcon GT-HO Phase III (XY)
Horsepower425 hp300 hp
Torque490 lb-ft369 lb-ft
Engine Size6,981 cc5,766 cc
0-60 mph5.5 sec6.4 sec
Top Speed200 mph142 mph
¼ Mile13.5 sec14.4 sec
Weight3,900 lbs
Wheelbase2,997 mm2,819 mm
Length5,749 mm4,870 mm
Units Produced503300
Original MSRP$4,369
Value (Excellent)$1,500,000$1,500,000
Collectibility10/105/10
Rarity10/109/10
The Verdict

The 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III (XY) brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Ford heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

Putting the 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona against the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III (XY) is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Australia. The 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona holds a clear advantage in raw power with 425 hp compared to 300 hp, a 125-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Dodge Charger uses a V8 OHV (Hemi) displacing 6,981 cc, while the Ford Falcon relies on a V8 OHV with 5,766 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona edges ahead at 5.5 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1971 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III (XY) commands a significant premium over the 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1966 Dodge Charger Daytona rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.