Japan vs Japan — 1985 vs 1974
| RX-7 FC3S Turbo II | RX-4 Coupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 200 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 195 lb-ft | 119 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,308 cc | 1,308 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 9.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 146 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 17.2 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,535 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,430 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,530 mm |
| Units Produced | 272,027 | 86,522 |
| Original MSRP | — | $4,795 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $35,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 7/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1985 Mazda RX-7 FC3S Turbo II offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1974 Mazda RX-4 Coupe counters with greater rarity, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mazda RX-7 lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1985 Mazda RX-7 FC3S Turbo II with the 1974 Mazda RX-4 Coupe reveals how Mazda refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1985 Mazda RX-7 FC3S Turbo II holds a clear advantage in raw power with 200 hp compared to 110 hp, a 90-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-7 uses a Wankel Rotary 13B Twin-Scroll Turbocharged displacing 1,308 cc, while the Mazda RX-4 relies on a Rotary (Wankel) 13B with 1,308 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1985 Mazda RX-7 FC3S Turbo II edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 9.8 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.